linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] [UDP6]: Counter increment on BH mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071204035755.GA32263@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:57:55 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>, davem@...emloft.net,
	andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [UDP6]: Counter increment on BH mode

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:50:55AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>
> >  #include <linux/cache.h>
> >  #include <linux/snmp.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> 
> It's no need to include smp.h?

We need it for smp_processor_id.  Well we needed it before too but
there's probably some implicit inclusion which has made it work.
It's better to declare these inclusions explicitly as otherwise
they may break on less common architectures later.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/