linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] Linux Kernel Markers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <y0mr6i2z0qf.fsf@ton.toronto.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:03:20 -0500
From:	fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Mike Mason <mmlnx@...ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Linux Kernel Markers - Support Multiple Probes


Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> writes:

> I think this is complete overkill.  We should rather get one proper
> tracing infrastructure in tree instead of having multiple hacking ones
> in different places.  Yes, please consider this a NACK ;-)

Multiple handlers for markers makes exactly as much sense as multiple
handlers for colocated kprobes - and the latter we've had for years.

- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/