[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1196750413.25646.182.camel@ymzhang>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:40:13 +0800
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Although no source codes of volanoMark, I suspect it calls
> > Thread.sched. volanoMark is a kind of chatroom benchmark. When a
> > client sends out a message, server will send the message to all
> > clients. I suspect the client calls Thread.yield after sending out a
> > couple of messages.
>
> yeah, so far only volanomark seems to be affected by this, and if it
> indeed calls Thread.yield artificially it's a pretty stupid benchmark
> and it's not the fault of the JDK. If we had the source to volanomark we
> could fix this easily.
>
> > 2 JVM all have regression if sched_compat_yield=0.
> >
> > I ran some testing, such like iozone/specjbb/tbench/dbench/sysbench,
> > and didn't see regression.
>
> which JVM was utilized by the specjbb (Java Business Benchmark) tests?
BEA Jrockit. It supports huge pages which promote performance for about 8%~10%.
-yanmin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists