linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386 IOAPIC: de-fang IRQ compression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071204212805.GB10360@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:28:05 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Christian Kujau <christian@...ouse.de>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 IOAPIC: de-fang IRQ compression


* Christian Kujau <christian@...ouse.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> thanks for the patch and the extensive description. I've applied this to
>> x86.git. Do you agree that this has no urgency for v2.6.24 and is thus
>> v2.6.25 material?
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but: aren't we in -rc already? I was under the 
> assumption that during the -rc phase only (release-)critical bugfixes 
> would be applied? So this one *must* be 2.6.25 material, right?

that was just a boilerplate question from me to make sure there's no 
misunderstanding about where it got queued and what the planned timeline 
is.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/