linux-kernel - Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071204232045.212ba1bf.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:20:45 +0100
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	"J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

El Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:47:45 +0100, "J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@....com> escribió:

> That is what I like of C++, with good placement of high level features
> like const's and & (references) one can gain fine control over what
> gets copied or not.

But...if there's some way Linux can get "language improvements", is with
new C standards/gccextensions/etc. It'd be nice if people tried to add
(useful) C extensions to gcc, instead of proposing some random language :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/