linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix for futex_wait signal stack corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712041436100.13796@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:43:29 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Holmes - Sun Microsystems <David.Holmes@....COM>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for futex_wait signal stack corruption

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Seems that arg3 is not used here and since the timer is 64 bits, we can
> store the bottom 32 bits in arg2 and the top in arg3 (this will work for
> both 32 and 64 bit archs).

Yes. That should work fine.

The restart logic sometimes results in odd calling conventions, and quite 
frankly, we could just change how "restart_block" looks too. There is 
nothing that says that it has to be

	unsigned long arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3

and that particular layout was just picked on a whim. The only issue is:

 - we don't want the restart block to be *too* large, since it's part of 
   the thread info.
 - but we need to have enough room for all the system calls that want to 
   use the restart block, and preferably in a reasonable format.

So far, using "unsigned long" has been good enough, in that it's big 
enough for a pointer and all normal arguments, but if something really 
deeply wants another format or a guaranteed 64-bit word regardless of 
architecture, we could make one or more of the arguments be "u64" instead.

But in this case, since there is already unused argument space, I think 
that doing the "32 high bits + 32 low bits" is probably the best option.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/