lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:57:55 -0800 From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Unify include/asm-x86/linkage_[32|64].h On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 23:45 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:27:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if the definition of asmlinkage and prevent_tail_call can > > > > > be omitted as well and let the linux/linkage.h version get picked up > > > > > instead. > > > > > > > > no, we cannot remove them - asmlinkage is needed for the syscall > > > > entry (and other entry code) to work, the and the prevent_tail_call > > > > works around a compiler bug. (which might or might not be fixed in > > > > latest gcc - but we generally dont remove workarounds unless we are > > > > really sure it's fine.) > > > > > > OK, but if this patch is acceptable, then there is no more places in > > > the tree that define the FASTCALL macro, other than the empty default > > > in include/linux/linkage.h. So I think a second step would be to > > > start to get rid of FASTCALL callers elsewhere in the tree...thoughts? > > > > the removal of FASTCALL is fine: the default (and only) compiler model > > for x86 (32-bit) is regparm(3), so the regparm(3) macro is equivalent to > > the empty one in linux/linkage.h. > >... > > But please ensure that they stay in assembler code also used by UML. I'm curious how UML is using FASTCALL/fastcall. Any pointers? Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists