[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712040301380.3025@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 03:02:02 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The use of KOBJ_NAME_LEN
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:50:53AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > Does the KOBJ_NAME_LEN really means the limit of kobject name length? seems not . And if it's true, is the KOBJ_NAME_LEN of 20 enough to use?
> > >
> > > In the kobject_set_name, the limit is 1024. Looks like either the comment or the code should be updated.
> > >
> > > /**
> > > * kobject_set_name - Set the name of an object
> > > * @kobj: object.
> > > * @fmt: format string used to build the name
> > > *
> > > * If strlen(name) >= KOBJ_NAME_LEN, then use a dynamically allocated
> > > * string that @kobj->k_name points to. Otherwise, use the static
> > > * @kobj->name array.
> > > */
> >
> > the comment seems fairly clear -- if the name is sufficiently short,
> > it's stored in the static array. if not, then it's stored in
> > dynamically allocated space.
>
> Unfortunately, it's totally wrong, the code was updated by the comment
> wasn't, sorry. See my patch to fix this.
ah, quite right, now i see what dave was talking about.
rday
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists