[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071204012301.4349bbd0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:23:01 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7][QUOTA] Move sysctl management code under ifdef
CONFIG_SYSCTL
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:58:30 +0300 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> >> register_sysctl_table(sys_table);
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> dquot_cachep = kmem_cache_create("dquot",
> >> sizeof(struct dquot), sizeof(unsigned long) * 4,
> >
> > We should avoid the ifdefs around the register_sysctl_table() call.
> >
> > At present the !CONFIG_SYSCTL implementation of register_sysctl_table() is
> > a non-inlined NULL-returning stub. All we have to do is to inline that stub
> > then these ifdefs can go away.
>
> What if some code checks for the return value to be not-NULL? In case
> CONFIG_SYSCTL=n this code will always think, that the registration failed.
The stub function should return success?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists