linux-kernel - Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4756D1F1.9030200@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:29:37 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Jie Chen <chen@...b.org>, Simon Holm Th??gersen <odie@...aau.dk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4

Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> * Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> 
>> $ gcc -O2 -o burner burner.c
>> $ ./burner
>> Time to perform the unit of work on one thread is 0.040328 s
>> Time to perform the unit of work on 2 threads is 0.040221 s
> 
> ok, but this actually suggests that scheduling is fine for this, 
> correct?
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> 

Yes, But this machine runs an old kernel. I was just giving you how to run it :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/