| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:51:36 -0800 From: "Brett Warden" <brett.warden@...il.com> To: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: Adds module parameter 'aggressive' to skip polite auto-detection prior to direct initialization. Sorry, forgot to copy back to the lists. On Dec 5, 2007 8:49 AM, Brett Warden <brett.warden@...il.com> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2007 4:46 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > > > Someone still has a bw-qcam device ? > > Yes. I haven't found a better option for very-low-light, although I > admit I haven't looked in a long while. The last one I tried was an > OV518+, but of course that driver seems to have been abandoned. > > > The status polling ought to be rock solid - what values do you see ? > > It has been as high as 94-96, but after being connected, powered, and > used for a while, it drops sometimes into the 40s, but has even been > as low as 8-14. When it's that low, it never comes back up until > either I disconnect/reconnect the power, or I force the driver to > initialize it through this hack. Even after trying that again just > now, it's ranging from 24-33. > > -- > Brett Warden > -- Brett Warden -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists