linux-kernel - Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071205103054B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, matthew@....cx
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, anders.henke@...d1.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in
 directory)

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900
> FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
> > > Anders Henke <anders.henke@...d1.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
> > > > > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a
> > > > > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
> > > > > that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity, 
> > > > > I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver by the 2.6.19 one by copying 
> > > > > driver/scsi/dpt_i2o.c driver/scsi/dpti.h and driver/scsi/dpt/ into a 
> > > > > vanilla 2.6.23.1. kernel; using this kernel fixed the issue for me.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I haven't yet fine-tested from which kernel release on the dpt_i2o driver 
> > > > > behaves like this and spews out zeroed blocks when trying to mount
> > > > > the rootfs. Maybe this is just some timing issue.
> > > > 
> > > > I've started the fine-tests and can say so far that dpt_i2o from 
> > > > 2.6.22 is still fine. Test is simple:
> > > > 
> > > > anders@...a:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/dpt$ cp -r dpt/ dpt_i2o.c dpti.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1/drivers/scsi/
> > > > 
> > > > ... recompile the kernel, reboot: works.
> > > > 
> > > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 differ in terms of the dpt_i2o driver by two different
> > > > patch sets:
> > > > -one 2 Kb small set of patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.22-rc1
> > > > -one 7 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc3
> > > > -one 162 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc9 to 2.6.23-rc10.
> > > > 
> > > > When applying the 2.6.23-rc1-based driver to "my" 2.6.31.1 kernel,
> > > > the "zero blocks"-symptom show up, so it's the "lucky" situation
> > > > that the smallest patch actually seams to be the broken one.
> > > > 
> > > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
> > > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
> > > > 
> > > > FUJITA Tomonori 
> > > > 
> > > >       [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
> > > > 
> > > > Stephen Rothwell 
> > > >       dpt_i2o depends on virt_to_bus
> > > > 
> > > > Fujita, would you please take a look at this?
> > > 
> > > He won't have seen this.  cc's added.
> > > 
> > > > I think that something's broken in there, leading to the dpt_i2o 
> > > > sending out blocks of zeroes right after initialization, at least on
> > > > some specific controllers (in this case, Adaptec 2010S on Intel
> > > > SE7501WV2S-based boxes).
> > > > 
> > > > I don't have insight kernel driver development knowledge, so I'm
> > > > quite out of help right now. Nevertheless, I'll add the diff
> > > > from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23-rc1 in terms of dpt_i2o:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Can you please confirm that this revert (against 2.6.24-rc4) fixes the data
> > > corruption problems?
> > 
> > Anders said that my patch is fine and seems that Matthew's hotplug
> > conversion patch leads to the problem:
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119641892129732&w=2
> 
> Oh.  Jan broke message threading :(
> 
> So it's been nearly a week and nothing has happened?  Do we revert that
> change?

SCSI people really want this conversion...

Matthew, did you have a chance to look at it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/