[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712041740490.13796@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:46:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Holmes - Sun Microsystems <David.Holmes@....COM>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for futex_wait signal stack corruption
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Since arg3 is out, which do you prefer? Creating an arg4 (and perhaps
> more) in the block or having a u64 arg? Changing all the args to u64 may
> be the best.
I suspect that the best option is probably to make that thing a unnamed
union of the actual different types the different restart cases needs,
which also allows you to name things appropriately and not have any wasted
space.
Leave the arg0-3 ones around as one of the unions, both to avoid having to
change other things and to have a "generic" one for stuff that simply
doesn't much care (in order to not have tons and tons of substructures to
the union when most users really don't need any fancy types).
I think we already depend on recent-enough gcc's that unnamed unions are
ok and we don't need to play games with naming.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists