linux-kernel - Re: How to manage shared persistent local caching (FS-Cache) with NFS?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:50:09 -0500
From:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: How to manage shared persistent local caching (FS-Cache) with
	NFS?

On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:11 +0000, David Howells wrote:

> The downside of this is that each shared superblock only has one NFS connection
> to the server, and so only one set of connection parameters can be used.
> However, since persistent local caching is novel to Linux, I think that it is
> entirely reasonable to overrule the attempts to make mounts with different
> parameters if they are to be shared and cached.

I think the shared superblock approach is the right one, but I'm a
little concerned that there would now be different behavior for fscache
and non-cached setups. Not sure of any better idea though.

> The R/O mount flag can be dealt with by moving readonlyness into the vfsmount
> rather than having it a property of the superblock.  The superblock would then
> be read-only only if all its vfsmounts are also read-only.

Given that, how many connection parameters are there that are likely to
actually differ on the same client, talking to the same server? Really?

> Would it be reasonable to have an outside way of setting directory options?
> For instance, if there was a table like this:
> 
> 	FS	SERVER	VOLUME	DIR		OPTIONS
> 	=======	=======	=======	===============	=========================
> 	nfs	home0	-	/home/*		fscache
> 	afs	redhat	data	/data/*		fscache
> 
> This could then be loaded into the kernel as a set of rules which directory
> lookup by the filesystem involved could attempt to match and apply.

You could store the table in a NIS map, for example, and a udev rule or
similar could trigger to load it later.

Jon.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/