lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:08:07 -0800 From: "Jared Hulbert" <jaredeh@...il.com> To: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: solid state drive access and context switching On Dec 4, 2007 3:24 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > Right. The trend is to hide the nastiness of NAND technology changes > > behind controllers. In general I think this is a good thing. > > You miss the point - any controller you hide it behind almost inevitably > adds enough latency you don't want to use it synchronously. I think I get it. We keep saying that it's the latency is too high. I agree that most technologies out there have latencies that are too high. Again I ask the question, what latencies do we have to hit before the sync options become worth it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists