lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:21:55 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Cc: Holger.Wolf@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduler behaviour * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: > > We discovered performance degradation with dbench when using kernel > > 2.6.23 compared to kernel 2.6.22. > > We've fixed a lot of regressions and made a lot of other changes to > the scheduler since .23. Could you please try the backport of the > latest scheduler on top of .23 to see if any of our recent work solved > your problem? (using a backport against .23 or even .22 allows you to > test just the scheduler changes in isolation) actually, i'd suggest to use the CFS backport against .22 right away: > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.13-v24.patch that would exclude all other changes that happened in 2.6.23. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists