[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475726C0.9060803@rtr.ca>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:31:28 -0500
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Radoslaw Szkodzinski <lkml@...ralstorm.puszkin.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:27:15 +0100
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
>>> Kernel waiting 2 minutes on TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE is certainly
>>> broken.
>> What should it do when the NFS server doesn't answer anymore or
>> when the network to the SAN RAID array located a few hundred KM away
>> develops some hickup? Or just the SCSI driver decides to do lengthy
>> error recovery -- you could argue that is broken if it takes longer
>> than 2 minutes, but in practice these things are hard to test
>> and to fix.
>>
>
> the scsi layer will have the IO totally aborted within that time anyway;
> the retry timeout for disks is 30 seconds after all.
..
Mmm.. but the SCSI layer may do many retries, each with 30sec timeouts..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists