| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20071204.220150.141230758.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:01:50 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: ebiederm@...ssion.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, greearb@...delatech.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org, lkml@....ca, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL" From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:03:01 -0700 > I am confused. I don't see a path forward that feels right. Eric, instead of writing a book about how you feel, look at the simple facts and resolve this quickly. You added a new key, the namespace, to the looking up of network objects. Big deal. That does not imply a change in licensing for the interfaces where you added that new aspect of the key to the argument list. This symbol licensing decision was not your's to make, so you must revert the new licensing change you are enforcing upon everyone. I want a de-GPL patch in my mailbox from you within the next 24 hours or I will code one up myself. This is getting beyond rediculious. My patience is completely gone on this matter, resolve this now. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists