linux-kernel - Re: NET: ASSERT_RTNL in __dev_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071205062540.GA987@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:25:41 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NET: ASSERT_RTNL in __dev_set_promiscuity makes debug warning

On 04-12-2007 23:26, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> But, IMHO, blowing ASSERT_RTNL up in a few places shouldn't be much
> worse. After all, how long such a debugging code should be kept. It
> seems, at least sometimes we should be a bit more confident of how
> it's called.

I see this won't be done this way, but, if it were, then there is no
reason to remove the second: documenting feature of ASSERT_RTNL, so
some comment about locking should be added.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/