lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:30:23 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: sockets affected by IPsec always block (2.6.23)

From: Herbert Xu <>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:12:32 +1100

> [INET]: Export non-blocking flags to proto connect call
> Previously we made connect(2) block on IPsec SA resolution.  This is
> good in general but not desirable for non-blocking sockets.
> To fix this properly we'd need to implement the larval IPsec dst stuff
> that we talked about.  For now let's just revert to the old behaviour
> on non-blocking sockets.
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <>

We made an explicit decision not to do things this way.

Non-blocking has a meaning dependant upon the xfrm_larval_drop sysctl
setting, and this is across the board.  If xfrm_larval_drop is zero,
non-blocking semantics do not extend to IPSEC route resolution,
otherwise it does.

If he sets this sysctl to "1" as I detailed in my reply, he'll
get the behavior he wants.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists