[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712072035.47359.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:35:47 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jing Xue <jingxue@...izenstudio.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, git@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git guidance
Phillip Susi wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > IOW, git currently only implements the server-side use-case, but fails
> > to deliver on the client-side. By introducing a git-client manager that
> > handles the transparency needs of a single user, it should be possible
> > to clearly isolate update semantics for both the client and the server,
> > each handling their specific use-case.
>
> Any talk of client or server makes no sense since git does not use a
> client/server model.
Whether git uses the client/server model or not does not matter; what matters
is that there are two distinct use-cases at work here: one on the
server/repository, and the other on the client.
> If you wish to use a centralized repository, then
> git can be set up to transparently push/pull to/from said repository if
> you wish via hooks or cron jobs.
Again, this only handles the interface to/from the server/repository, but
once you pulled the sources, it leaves you without Version Control on the
client.
By pulling the sources into a git-client manager mounted on some dir, it
should be possible to let the developer work naturally/transparently in a
readable/writeable manner, and only require his input when reverting locally
or committing to the server/repository.
Thanks!
--
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists