[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071206204152.16103.44490.stgit@kernel>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:41:52 -0800
From: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ibm.com>,
Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: handle write-protection faults in follow_hugetlb_page
The follow_hugetlb_page() fix I posted (merged as git commit
5b23dbe8173c212d6a326e35347b038705603d39) missed one case. If the pte is
present, but not writable and write access is requested by the caller to
get_user_pages(), the code will do the wrong thing. Rather than calling
hugetlb_fault to make the pte writable, it notes the presence of the pte
and continues.
This simple one-liner makes sure we also fault on the pte for this case.
Please apply.
Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ibm.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 6121b57..6f97821 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ int follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*/
pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, vaddr & HPAGE_MASK);
- if (!pte || pte_none(*pte)) {
+ if (!pte || pte_none(*pte) || (write && !pte_write(*pte))) {
int ret;
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists