linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47586F67.8020101@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:53:43 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	Holger.Wolf@...ibm.com, wolf@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler behaviour

Arjan van de Ven wrote, On 12/05/2007 10:26 PM:

> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:15:30 +0100
> Holger Wolf <wolf@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

...

>> a 2.6.23 kernel. We saw a throughput degradation from 7.2 to 23.4
> 
> this is good news!
> dbench rewards unfair behavior... so higher dbench usually means a
> worse kernel ;)


Yes!!!

(But, with those new patches, I guess, our kernel will be worse enough?!)

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/