linux-kernel - Re: Kernel 2.6.23.9 / P35 Chipset + WD 750GB Drives (reset port)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712061737500.8523@p34.internal.lan>
Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:38:08 -0500 (EST)
From:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, apiszcz@...arrain.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.23.9 / P35 Chipset + WD 750GB Drives (reset port)



On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:26:08 -0500 (EST)
> Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> wrote:
>
>> I am putting a new machine together and I have dual raptor raid 1 for the
>> root, which works just fine under all stress tests.
>>
>> Then I have the WD 750 GiB drive (not RE2, desktop ones for ~150-160 on
>> sale now adays):
>>
>> I ran the following:
>>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sde
>>
>> (as it is always a very good idea to do this with any new disk)
>>
>> And sometime along the way(?) (i had gone to sleep and let it run), this
>> occurred:
>>
>> [42880.680144] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4010000
>> action 0x2 frozen
>
> Gee we're seeing a lot of these lately.
>
>> [42880.680231] ata3.00: irq_stat 0x00400040, connection status changed
>> [42880.680290] ata3.00: cmd ec/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb
>> 0x0 data 512 in
>> [42880.680292]          res 40/00:ac:d8:64:54/00:00:57:00:00/40 Emask 0x10
>> (ATA bus error)
>> [42881.841899] ata3: soft resetting port
>> [42885.966320] ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> [42915.919042] ata3.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
>> [42915.919094] ata3.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x5)
>> [42915.919149] ata3.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
>> [42915.919206] ata3: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
>> [42920.912458] ata3: hard resetting port
>> [42926.411363] ata3: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status
>> 0x80)
>> [42930.943080] ata3: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>> [42930.943130] ata3: hard resetting port
>> [42931.399628] ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> [42931.413523] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> [42931.413586] ata3: EH pending after completion, repeating EH (cnt=4)
>> [42931.413655] ata3: EH complete
>> [42931.413719] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] 1465149168 512-byte hardware sectors
>> (750156 MB)
>> [42931.413809] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off
>> [42931.413856] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
>> [42931.413867] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache:
>> enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
>>
>> Usually when I see this sort of thing with another box I have full of
>> raptors, it was due to a bad raptor and I never saw it again after I
>> replaced the disk that it happened on, but that was using the Intel P965
>> chipset.
>>
>> For this board, it is a Gigabyte GSP-P35-DS4 (Rev 2.0) and I have all of
>> the drives (2 raptors, 3 750s connected to the Intel ICH9 Southbridge).
>>
>> I am going to do some further testing but does this indicate a bad drive?
>> Bad cable?  Bad connector?
>>
>> As you can see above, /dev/sdc stopped responding for a little bit and
>> then the kernel reset the port.
>>
>> Why is this though?  What is the likely root cause?  Should I replace the
>> drive?  Obviously this is not normal and cannot be good at all, the idea
>> is to put these drives in a RAID5 and if one is going to timeout that is
>> going to cause the array to go degraded and thus be worthless in a raid5
>> configuration.
>>
>> Can anyone offer any insight here?
>
> It would be interesting to try 2.6.21 or 2.6.22.
>

This was due to NCQ issues (disabling it fixed the problem).

Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/