lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:29:38 +0100 From: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>, Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched_clock Le Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:51:21 +0100, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> a écrit : > yeah, we can do something like this in 2.6.25 - this will improve the > quality of sched_clock(). Thanks a lot for your interest! I'll clean it up and resend it later. As I don't have the necessary knowledge to do the tsc_{32,64}.c unification, should I copy paste common functions into tsc_32.c and tsc_64.c to ease later unification or should I start a common .c file? Thanks again for showing interest. -- Guillaume -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists