linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:29:38 +0100
From:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
	Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched_clock

Le Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:51:21 +0100,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> a écrit :

> yeah, we can do something like this in 2.6.25 - this will improve the 
> quality of sched_clock().

Thanks a lot for your interest!

I'll clean it up and resend it later. As I don't have the necessary
knowledge to do the tsc_{32,64}.c unification, should I copy paste
common functions into tsc_32.c and tsc_64.c to ease later unification
or should I start a common .c file?

Thanks again for showing interest.

-- 
Guillaume
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/