linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071207023241.15274ef6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 7 Dec 2007 02:32:41 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
	Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched_clock

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:45:59 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it> wrote:
> 
> > This patch fixes a regression introduced by:
> > 
> > commit bb29ab26863c022743143f27956cc0ca362f258c
> > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Date:   Mon Jul 9 18:51:59 2007 +0200
> > 
> > This caused the jiffies counter to leap back and forth on cpufreq 
> > changes on my x86 box. I'd say that we can't always assume that TSC 
> > does "small errors" only, when marked unstable. On cpufreq changes 
> > these errors can be huge.
> 
> ah, printk_clock() still uses sched_clock(), not jiffies. So it's not 
> the jiffies counter that goes back and forth, it's sched_clock() - so 
> this is a printk timestamps anomaly, not related to jiffies. I thought 
> we have fixed this bug in the printk code already: sched_clock() is a 
> 'raw' interface that should not be used directly - the proper interface 
> is cpu_clock(cpu). Does the patch below help?
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> ----------------------->
> Subject: sched: fix CONFIG_PRINT_TIME's reliance on sched_clock()
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
> Stefano Brivio reported weird printk timestamp behavior during
> CPU frequency changes:
> 
>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475
> 
> fix CONFIG_PRINT_TIME's reliance on sched_clock() and use cpu_clock()
> instead.
> 
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
>  kernel/printk.c |    2 +-
>  kernel/sched.c  |    7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/kernel/printk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/printk.c
> +++ linux/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, 
>  					loglev_char = default_message_loglevel
>  						+ '0';
>  				}
> -				t = printk_clock();
> +				t = cpu_clock(printk_cpu);
>  				nanosec_rem = do_div(t, 1000000000);
>  				tlen = sprintf(tbuf,
>  						"<%c>[%5lu.%06lu] ",

A bit risky - it's quite an expansion of code which no longer can call printk.

You might want to take that WARN_ON out of __update_rq_clock() ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/