[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712071353.11654.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:53:11 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@....se>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@....de>,
Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jing Xue <jingxue@...izenstudio.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, git@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git guidance
Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> So, to get to the bottom of this, which of the following workflows is it
> you want git to support?
>
> ### WORKFLOW A ###
> edit, edit, edit
> edit, edit, edit
> edit, edit, edit
> Oops I made a mistake and need to hop back to "current - 12".
> edit, edit, edit
> edit, edit, edit
> publish everything, similar to just tarring up your workdir and sending
> out ### END WORKFLOW A ###
>
> ### WORKFLOW B ###
> edit, edit, edit
> ok this looks good, I want to save a checkpoint here
> edit, edit, edit
> looks good again. next checkpoint
> edit, edit, edit
> oh crap, back to checkpoint 2
> edit, edit, edit
> ooh, that's better. save a checkpoint and publish those checkpoints
> ### END WORKFLOW B ###
### WORKFLOW C ###
for every save on a gitfs mounted dir, do an implied checkpoint, commit, or
publish (should be adjustable), on its privately created on-the-fly
repository.
### END WORKFLOW C ###
For example:
echo "// last comment on this file" >> /gitfs.mounted/file
should do an implied checkpoint, and make these checkpoints immediately
visible under some checkpoint branch of the gitfs mounted dir.
Note, this way the developer gets version control without even noticing, and
works completely transparent to any kind of application.
Thanks!
--
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists