[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071207152741.3408aeef@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:27:41 +0100
From: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: scale cyc_2_nsec according to CPU frequency
Le Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:55:25 +0100,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> a écrit :
> Firstly, we dont need the 'offset' anymore because cpu_clock() maintains
> offsets itself.
Yes, but a lower quality one. __update_rq_clock tries to compensate
large jumping clocks with a jiffy resolution, while my offset arranges
for a very smooth frequency transition.
I agree with keeping a single offset, but I liked the fact that with my
patch on frequency change, the clock had no jump at all.
> + * ns += offset to avoid sched_clock jumps with cpufreq
I guess this needs to go away if I don't make my point :-(
> + printk("CPU#%d: changed cyc2ns scale from %ld to %ld\n",
> + cpu, prev_scale, *scale);
Pointing it out just to be sure it does not end in the final version ;-)
Thanks for cleaning up my mess ;-)
--
Guillaume
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists