lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:41:02 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unify segment headers * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In this patch, I unify segment_32.h and segment_64.h into segment.h > They have some common parts, but a considerable ammount of code still > has to be around ifdefs. > > The only patch that is really important to paravirt is the first one, > that moves a paravirt definition into the common header. The other two > are just normal integration, and pretty much independent thanks, i've picked them up for x86.git. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists