linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unify segment headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071207204102.GA25424@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:41:02 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com,
	jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unify segment headers


* Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In this patch, I unify segment_32.h and segment_64.h into segment.h 
> They have some common parts, but a considerable ammount of code still 
> has to be around ifdefs.
> 
> The only patch that is really important to paravirt is the first one, 
> that moves a paravirt definition into the common header. The other two 
> are just normal integration, and pretty much independent

thanks, i've picked them up for x86.git.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/