| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <43e72e890712071422j34ca2338xf98fda661f3c22fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:22:24 -0500 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...lab.rutgers.edu> To: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com, mickflemm@...il.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some inline functions like this: > drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available > > fix it with adjust the order of inline function body. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com> Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...lab.rutgers.edu> Thanks Dave. What version of gcc were you using? I haven't run into this. BTW, nothing new was added in this patch, things were just shifted, but even that may be copyrightable. Is it fair to assume you are licensing these changes under the same license the file is in? For this file we'd usually use: Changes-licensed-under: 3-clause-BSD For future reference: http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#Changes-licensed-undertag Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists