linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4759D6AF.5050205@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:26:39 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	swise@...ngridcomputing.com, wenxiong@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters

Divy Le Ray wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Divy Le Ray wrote:
>>> From: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
>>>
>>> Add parity initialization for T3C adapters.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h       |    1 
>>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c    |   82 ++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c |   15 ++
>>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/regs.h          |  248 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/sge.c           |   24 +++-
>>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/t3_hw.c         |  131 +++++++++++++++++---
>>>  6 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> dropped patches 2-3, did not apply
>>
>>
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> I noticed that you applied the first one of this 3 patches series to the 
> #upstream-fixes branch.
> These patches are intended to the #upstream (2.6.25) branch, as they are 
> built on top of the
> last 10 patches committed - 9 from me, and the white space clean up 
> (thanks!).
> May be this is the reason why they did not apply.

Ah... you need to tell me these things.  I looked for a kernel version 
in your messages but did not see one.

Does the patch #1 need to be reverted for 2.6.24?


> On this topic, I have a question: how do I get to see all the netdev-2.6 
> branches ?
> After cloning a free  netdev-2.6 tree, 'git branch' shows only the 
> master branch:
> 
> bash-3.1$ git --version
> git version 1.5.3.rc4.29.g74276-dirty
> -bash-3.1$ stg clone 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git 
> netdev-2.6-fresh
> Cloning 
> "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git" 
> into "netdev-2.6-fresh"...
> Initialized empty Git repository in /opt/sources/netdev-2.6-fresh/.git/
> remote: Generating pack...
> remote: Counting objects: 620879
> Done counting 633562 objects.
> remote: Deltifying 633562 objects...
> remote:  100% (633562/633562) done
> Indexing 633562 objects...
> remote: Total 633562 (delta 517968), reused 594305 (delta 478716)
> 100% (633562/633562) done
> Resolving 517968 deltas...
> 100% (517968/517968) done
> Checking 23058 files out...
> 100% (23058/23058) done
> done
> -bash-3.1$ cd netdev-2.6-fresh/
> -bash-3.1$ git branch
> * master

git fetch -f $NETDEV_URL upstream:upstream

copies the latest upstream branch from netdev-2.6.git, and stores it as 
your local upstream branch.

You may do the same for #upstream-fixes too.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/