[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475AB2FD.30600@rtr.ca>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:06:37 -0500
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>, stefano.brivio@...imi.it,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched_clock
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>...
> thanks. I do get the impression that most of this can/should wait until
> 2.6.25. The patches look quite dangerous.
..
I confess to not really trying hard to understand everything in this thread,
but the implication seems to be that this bug might affect udelay()
and possibly jiffies ?
If so, then fixing it has to be a *must* for 2.6.24, as otherwise we'll get
all sorts of one-in-while odd driver bugs.. like maybe these two for starters:
[Bug 9492] 2.6.24: false double-clicks from USB mouse
[Bug 9489] 20000+ wake-ups/second in 2.6.24
Neither of which happens often enough to explain or debug,
but either of which *could* be caused by some weird jiffies thing maybe.
???
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists