[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712081034470.12046@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:37:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52,
[2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23]
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > So which warning is it that triggers the bogus error?
>
> It's a kmap_atomic() debugging patch which I wrote ages ago and whcih Ingo
> sucked into his tree. I don't _think_ this warning is present in your tree
> at all.
Ok, that explains it.
> Knocking out __GFP_ZERO at the point where the slab allocator(s) call the
> page allocator seems like a good approach to me.
>
> But I don't think we need to do anything for 2.6.24..
Good. Although we should perhaps look at that reported performance problem
with SLUB. It looks like SLUB will do a memclear() for the area twice
(first for the whole page, then for the thing it allocated) for the slow
case. Maybe that exacerbates the problem.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists