linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] Unionfs: reduce the amount of cache-coherency debugging messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <11971467681601-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Sat,  8 Dec 2007 15:46:05 -0500
From:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Unionfs: reduce the amount of cache-coherency debugging messages

Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
---
 fs/unionfs/dentry.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index 05d9914..7d27987 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -195,9 +195,11 @@ out:
  * file system doesn't change its inode times quick enough, resulting in a
  * false positive indication (which is harmless, it just makes unionfs do
  * extra work in re-validating the objects).  To minimize the chances of
- * these situations, we delay the detection of changed times by
- * UNIONFS_MIN_CC_TIME (which defaults to 3 seconds, as with NFS's
- * acregmin).
+ * these situations, we still consider such small time changes valid, but we
+ * don't print debugging messages unless the time changes are greater than
+ * UNIONFS_MIN_CC_TIME (which defaults to 3 seconds, as with NFS's acregmin)
+ * because significant changes are more likely due to users manually
+ * touching lower files.
  */
 bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
 {
@@ -219,20 +221,26 @@ bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
 			continue;
 
 		/* check if mtime/ctime have changed */
-		if (unlikely((lower_inode->i_mtime.tv_sec -
-			      inode->i_mtime.tv_sec) > UNIONFS_MIN_CC_TIME)) {
-			pr_info("unionfs: new lower inode mtime "
-				"(bindex=%d, name=%s)\n", bindex,
-				dentry->d_name.name);
-			show_dinode_times(dentry);
+		if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime,
+					      &lower_inode->i_mtime) < 0)) {
+			if ((lower_inode->i_mtime.tv_sec -
+			     inode->i_mtime.tv_sec) > UNIONFS_MIN_CC_TIME) {
+				pr_info("unionfs: new lower inode mtime "
+					"(bindex=%d, name=%s)\n", bindex,
+					dentry->d_name.name);
+				show_dinode_times(dentry);
+			}
 			return true;
 		}
-		if (unlikely((lower_inode->i_ctime.tv_sec -
-			      inode->i_ctime.tv_sec) > UNIONFS_MIN_CC_TIME)) {
-			pr_info("unionfs: new lower inode ctime "
-				"(bindex=%d, name=%s)\n", bindex,
-				dentry->d_name.name);
-			show_dinode_times(dentry);
+		if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime,
+					      &lower_inode->i_ctime) < 0)) {
+			if ((lower_inode->i_ctime.tv_sec -
+			     inode->i_ctime.tv_sec) > UNIONFS_MIN_CC_TIME) {
+				pr_info("unionfs: new lower inode ctime "
+					"(bindex=%d, name=%s)\n", bindex,
+					dentry->d_name.name);
+				show_dinode_times(dentry);
+			}
 			return true;
 		}
 	}
-- 
1.5.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/