lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071208234612.GQ17037@thunk.org>
Date:	Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:46:12 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Ismail Dönmez <ismail@...dus.org.tr>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
	Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?

On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:10:10AM +0200, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> > As long as /dev/random is readable for all users there's no reason to
> > use /dev/urandom for a local DoS...
> 
> Draining entropy in /dev/urandom means that insecure and possibly not random 
> data will be used and well thats a security bug if not a DoS bug.

Actually in modern 2.6 kernels there are two separate output entropy
pools for /dev/random and /dev/urandom.  So assuming that the
adversary doesn't know the contents of the current state of the
entropy pool (i.e., the RNG is well seeded with entropy), you can read
all you want from /dev/urandom and that won't give an adversary
successful information to attack /dev/random.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ