[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0712072040300.26622@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:45:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fake NUMA emulation for PowerPC
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > You're going to want to distribute the cpu's based on how they match up
> > physically with the actual platform that you're running on. x86_64 does
>
> Could you explain this better, how does it match up CPU's with fake NUMA
> memory? Is there some smartness there? I'll try and look at the code and
> also see what I can do for PowerPC
>
numa_cpumask_lookup_table[] would return the correct cpumask for the fake
node index. Then all the code that uses node_to_cpumask() in generic
kernel code like the scheduler and VM still preserve their true NUMA
affinity that matches the underlying hardware. I tried to make x86_64
fake NUMA as close to the real thing as possible.
You also probably want to make all you changes dependent on
CONFIG_NUMA_EMU like the x86_64 case. That'll probably be helpful as you
extend this tool more and more.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists