lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071209152509.5c6e33a2@the-village.bc.nu> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 15:25:09 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 > Newly broken ones will be regressions. How many do we fix by the > change? On SATA, setting the correct transfer chunk size doesn't seem > to fix many. Regressions are not some kind of grand evil. Better to regress the odd device than continue to break entire controllers. > > Tejun - instead of backing out important updates for 2.6.24 we should > > just blacklist that specific drive for now and sort it nicely in 2.6.25, > > not revert stuff and break everyone elses ATAPI devices. > > We'll need to blacklist setting transfer chunk size, eek, and let's > leave that as the last resort and hope that we find the solution soon. > Blacklist takes time to develop and temporary blacklist for just one > release doesn't sound like a good idea. It seems to be sensible to me *if* it is just this one device we are somehow confusing and that one device is holding up fixing everything else. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists