[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071209075921.4a0e1240@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:59:21 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52,
[2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23]
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:20:19 +0200
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
\
> Now, while SLAB code is "pleasant and straightforward code" (thanks,
> btw) for UMA, it's really hairy for NUMA plus the "alien caches" eat
> tons of memory
.. and they make slab slower on numa systems for database workloads
(I'm sure they do fine for SGI's customers HPC load though))
>(which is why Christoph wrote SLUB in the first place,
> the current code in SLAB is mostly unfixable due to its *queuing*
> nature).
To be honest, a SLAB without the alien stuff might be one of the best
performers today .... ;)
(on database loads.. where slub is quite a disaster as everyone knows)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists