lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071209161605.GX19691@waste.org> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:16:05 -0600 From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> To: Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de> Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much? On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:42:00PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:26:47PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > > The distinction between /dev/random and /dev/urandom boils down to one > > word: paranoia. If you are not paranoid enough to mistrust your > > network, then /dev/random IS NOT FOR YOU. Use /dev/urandom. > > But currently, people who use /dev/urandom to obtain low-quality > entropy do a DoS for the paranoid people. Not true, as I've already pointed out in this thread. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists