lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071209165908.GA15910@one.firstfloor.org> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:59:08 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops > I mean, we expect 8usec delay -- historical ISA timing -- but when > _PCI_ card with leds is inserted, it is likely to be faster than old > ISA, right? Yes, i guess switching to udelay at least on newer systems would be a good idea. I'm not quite sure about systems without TSC though. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists