[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071209143059.7128abf5@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:30:59 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0500
"Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2007 6:12 PM, Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > No problems after disabling CONFIG_HIGHRES_TIMERS , CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> > and CONFIG_NO_HZ.
> >
> > I will try enabling them one by one - HRT, NOHZ and CPU_IDLE last -
> > that way we can at least tell what is required to be hit with this
> > problem.
>
> Looks like CPU_IDLE=y is necessary for the problem to show up.
> With CPU_IDLE=n HRT+NO_HZ+TICK_ONESHOT does not give soft lockup
> problems. (Actually with HIGH_RES_TIMERS=NO_HZ=TICK_ONESHOT=y I do
> see short freezes on ssh - when I cannot type anything for may be a
> second even under 100% idle. But Soft Lock up doesnt show up in dmesg
> with this configuration.)
starts to sound like something is turning off the clock during a somewhat deeper C-state...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists