| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing > > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in > > your regression list, > > Done, thanks. Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference (although I guess it's less efficient). Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25! - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists