linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071209021544.GY17037@thunk.org>
Date:	Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML
> > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing
> > the above regression.  Rafael, could you please make a note of this in
> > your regression list,
> 
> Done, thanks.

Great, thanks.  I should add that technically this wasn't a regression
since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23.  Also, it isn't a
big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to
polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference
(although I guess it's less efficient).  

Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the
patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25!

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/