lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:  <1197183090.12636.15.camel@perihelion>
Date:	Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:52:05 -0500
From:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?

On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 06:21 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Wouldn't it be possible to mix the data with the pid+uid of the reading
> process so that even if another one tries to collect data from urandom,
> he cannot predict what another process will get ? BTW, I think that the
> tuple (pid,uid,timestamp of open) is unpredictable and uncontrollable
> enough to provide one or even a few bits of entropy by itself.

Timestamp perhaps, but pid/uid are trivially guessable in automated
environments, such as LiveCDs. And if you're also running on an embedded
system without a RTC (common, folks like to save a few cents) then it's
all pretty much "trivially" guessable on some level.

Jon.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ