linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071210083717.GC22699@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:37:17 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in
	select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu


* Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com> wrote:

> From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
> 
> No need to do a check for 'affine wakeup and passive balancing 
> possibilities' in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu.
> 
> I guess, this part got missed upon introduction of per-sched_class 
> select_task_rq() in try_to_wake_up().

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/