[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071210085741.GA8437@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:27:41 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Instrumentation menu removal, against 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (mmotm)
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 10:32:55AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> This time I am taking no chance :
>
> The instrumentation menu removal patchset here applies against 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
> _and_ against mmotm (dated : stamp-2007-12-05-15-24) without problem.
>
> We should hopefully be able to stop racing against other architecture specific
> fixes done underneath. Please be aware that the following fix :
>
> - fix-oprofile-configuration-breakage.patch
>
> from MIPS did not show up in your mmotm tree. I guess you just sent it upstream
> without keeping it in your own tree. I have applied the content of this fix in
> my patchset (meaning : select HAVE_OPROFILE if !MIPS_MT_SMTC in
> add-have-oprofile.patch), but I think you might have a reject if you still have
> this fix-oprofile-configuration-breakage.patch in your local tree but not in
> mmotm.
Mathieu,
With this patchset, a `make defconfig' results in:
CONFIG_OPROFILE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_OPROFILE=y
CONFIG_KPROBES=y
CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES=y
You probably also need to change the defconfigs...
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists