[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071210132635.GA12913@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:26:35 +0000
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@...peaks.co.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert: PCI: fix IDE legacy mode resources
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:24:51PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> If that is the case though (that is it can't issue low ioport cycles),
> how would have the fd6e7321... worked in the first place ? Hrm...
> strange. My understanding is that all that patch does is put junk in the
> pci_dev resource structures :-) Maybe that's enough to cause the PCI
> layer later on to be unhappy about them and reassign the BARs to some
> place that works ? In which case, you are right, a better approach is a
> quirk on this specific platform, or even better, mark 0...0x10000000
> busy in ioport_resources and let the generic code clash & re-assign...
>
> I must admit I'm a bit confused tho...
>
> Anyway, so far, nobody is arguing in favor of keeping this patch in nor
> so far trying and explanation on why it wouldn't be totally bogus, so I
> suggest we revert it :-)
I certainly don't oppose at this point.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists