[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071210154747.GB17209@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:47:47 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
gnome42@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007 16:36:09 J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:19:12PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > It is best not to use nohide - we should probably mark it as
> > > > 'legacy'.
> > > >
> > > > Simply export the top level mountpoint as 'crossmnt' and everything
> > > > below there will be exported.
> > > >
> > > > > Where should I put those options in root file-system export or in submount export?
> > > >
> > > > crossmnt goes at the top. nohide goes in the submount. Both have
> > > > the same general effect though with subtle differences.
> > > > You don't need both (though that doesn't hurt).
> > > > Just use crossmnt at the top, Then you don't need to mention the
> > > > lower level filesystems at all.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > ...
> > > > > (I decided to switch to NFS4 only due to the lack of ability to see underlying mounts)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > All of this should work fine with v3. Once you have the right patch
> > > > for the crossmnt bug applied, if you have further problems post them
> > > > to linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org.
> > > >
> > > > NeilBrown
> > > >
> > >
> > > Big thanks,
> > >
> > > Still NFS server just don't want to accept the connection
> > > I noticed that if I first mount with
> > > -tnfs, unmount, and then mount with -tnfs4, it works
> >
> > OK, in that case, that's definitely the bug Eric sent out the patch for;
> > you may want to try applying his patch.
> You mean
> "[PATCH 2.6.24-rc4] proc: Remove/Fix proc generic d_revalidate" ?
>
> I did apply it (on both kernel and server), and it doesn't help.
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
>
> PS: I am unfamiliar with nfs/nfs4, so this could be just a
> configuration/compilation issue.
What do
ls /proc/fs/nfs
ls /proc/fs/nfsd
report?
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists