linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH acs_ame scsi driver 000 of 1] Introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:55:48 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	chang jeff <recalljeffchang@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH acs_ame scsi driver 000 of 1] Introduction

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:03:18PM +0800, chang jeff wrote:
> Dear Sir,
> 
> Following is patche for scsi driver in 2.6.23.9 what should get into
> 2.6.23.9-final if possible.
> 
> First refines a newly created scsi driver
> (/[kernel-version]/driver/scsi/acs_ame).
> 
> Thanks,
> JeffChang.

Hi Jeff,

You don't seem to have attached the driver ... maybe you sent a second
email that hasn't arrived yet?  I see Andrew sent a mail (possibly to
one of your colleagues?) that explains that he doesn't personally take
scsi driver patches: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/7

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/