[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071210201259.1ad466c7@poseidon.drzeus.cx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:12:59 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Correct types for mod_devicetable.h (was: Re: m68k build
failure)
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:11:12 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:08:18PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > This still requires a bit of maintenance to set up a kerneltypes.h for every arch.
>
> Better doing this work once than fixing similar issues again and again.
>
Agreed. But it raises the bar quite a bit to get this ready for upstream.
> > It also means we have to be very careful that gcc's internal alignment settings matched the ones in our header.
>
> There's nothing "gcc internal" about struct alignment - remember that
> any change in struct alignment would change our userspace ABI.
>
Oh? I would have guessed that everything going to and from userspace would be packed. Should probably consider myself lucky I have do deal with few such interactions. :)
Rgds
Pierre
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists