[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25991.1197330258@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:44:18 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Karl MacMillan <kmacmill@...hat.com>, viro@....linux.org.uk,
hch@...radead.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/28] SECURITY: Allow kernel services to override LSM settings for task actions [try #2]
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> That happens to me when interfaces are described in SELinux terms. I
> still don't care much for multiple contexts, and I don't have a good
> grasp of how you'll deal with Smack, or any LSM other than SELinux.
Me neither. I understand SELinux somewhat, though it's got a lot of wibbly
bits, and WinNT's security system, but I have no experience of the other
stuff.
> Just as Stephen mentions, I also don't see the generality that a change
> of this magnitude really ought to provide.
Perhaps it should be a specific interface, solely for cachefiles's use then.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists